Simply put: Understanding issues of illegal migration in new Citizenship Bill

At the heart of ongoing protests in Assam are ways in which the Bill seeks to extend special facilities to 6 religious groups from 3 neighbouring countries.

Written by Anviti Chaturvedi | New Delhi | Published:October 25, 2016 12:42 am
A protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Assam last week. (Source: PTI) A protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Assam last week. (Source: PTI)

Several groups in Assam, including the All Assam Students’ Union and BJP ally Asom Gana Parishad, have been protesting against the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016, which seeks to make foreign illegal migrants from some minority communities eligible for Indian citizenship. According to the Assam Accord of 1985, illegal migrants who had entered Assam from Bangladesh after March 25, 1971, were to be detected and deported. The protesting groups argue that the Bill contradicts the terms of the Accord. The Bill, which was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 19, is now before a Joint Parliamentary Committee, which is expected to submit its report in Parliament’s Winter Session.

Watch what else is making news:

So, who are illegal migrants, and how does the law treat them?

A foreigner is considered to be an illegal migrant under two circumstances. One, if they come into India without valid travel documents, like a visa and passport, or two, having come in legally, they stay beyond the time period permitted to them under their travel documents. Illegal migrants may be imprisoned or deported. They and their children are ineligible for Indian citizenship under the Citizenship Act of 1955.

However, certain benefits have been granted to some groups of illegal migrants. In September 2015 and July 2016, the central government exempted certain groups of illegal migrants from being imprisoned or deported. These are illegal migrants who came into India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan on or before December 31, 2014, and belong to the Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian religious communities. Illegal migrants from this group cannot be imprisoned or deported for not having valid travel documents.

How many illegal migrants are there in the country?

There are no official estimates — mainly because of the difficulty in tracking persons who have entered the country without the requisite papers. The only kind of data that is available is regarding the number of foreigners who, having entered India legally, have stayed back illegally. Official estimates put this number at 28,356 as of December 2014. The largest number among these illegal migrants are from Pakistan (15%), followed by Sri Lanka (14%), South Korea (6%) and Iraq (6%).

How does the new Bill seek to change the law on illegal migrants?

At present, a person can apply for Indian citizenship on grounds including being born in India, or to an Indian parent, or having resided in India over a certain period of time. However, an illegal migrant is prohibited from becoming an Indian citizen. The amendment Bill provides that illegal migrants belonging to the specified six minority communities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan will not be treated as illegal migrants and will, therefore, be eligible for Indian citizenship.

The Bill also relaxes the eligibility criteria for citizenship for persons from these six minority communities of the three neighbouring countries. As of now, a person must have resided in India for 12 of the 15 years preceding the date of application; the Bill relaxes the 12-year requirement to 7 years for this particular group of individuals.

Is the Bill differentiating among illegal migrants based on religion?

The Bill does not cover illegal migrants who are Muslim, or who belong to other minority communities such as Jews and Bahais from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan. This provision will have to be evaluated against the standard of equality guaranteed to all citizens and foreigners under Article 14 of the Constitution. Article 14 only allows laws to treat groups of people differently if there is a reasonable rationale for doing so. The government has not provided any clear rationale for making illegal migrants belonging to only some minority communities eligible for citizenship.

What are the other key aspects of the Bill?

The Bill also affects Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders. OCI cardholders are foreigners who are persons of Indian origin. For example, they may have been former Indian citizens, or children of current Indian citizens. An OCI enjoys benefits compared to other foreigners, such as the right to travel to India without a visa, or to work and study here.

At present, the government may cancel a person’s OCI registration on various grounds. In case of a cancellation, an OCI residing in India may be required to leave the country. The Bill seeks to add another ground for cancelling OCI registration — violation of any law in force in the country. This provides wide discretion to the government to cancel OCI registrations for both major offences like murder, as well as minor offences like parking in a no-parking zone or jumping a red light.

Anviti Chaturvedi is an analyst at PRS Legislative Research, New Delhi

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App

  1. v
    venky123
    Oct 25, 2016 at 4:52 am
    BJP is doing right thing here......... India is natural home for Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists from Afghanistan to Arunachal Pradesh...... actually government should not make rationale instead should just give this reason.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Let communists cry of equality...there hypocrisy has already been exposed by fake secular laws and keeping silent on UCC
    Reply
    1. G
      great
      Nov 4, 2016 at 12:05 pm
      India and stan came on world map as two nation while Muslims got two countries but in these countries no security of minorities on earth of God India is safe heaven for these apprehensive human so request please see this bill on human ground with sympathy instead of creating any problems
      Reply
      1. J
        Jai
        Oct 25, 2016 at 2:55 am
        Congress government ped the bill to show compion and tolerance to fellow citizens of Akhand Bharat.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;BJP government has its own hidden agenda - compion for Hindutva and the right to deport any who do not support Hindutva.
        Reply
        1. M
          Maheswar Deka
          Oct 25, 2016 at 4:53 am
          If the Hindu immigrants are to be accommodated in India, then, every state must accommodate the Hindu immigrants.Only one or two states should not be burdened with new batch of Hindu immigrants.
          Reply
          1. R
            rddy
            Oct 26, 2016 at 9:40 am
            Jai Miya, or Jallaudin Ahamad, India does need any more Muslims , we are having every day terrorism as a gift from Muslim brothers ,who has supported stan but sta hear in India due to selfish vote bank politician like Nehru Muslims have grown from 6% in 1947 to 16.5% In India, where as Hindus reduced to 1% in 2010 in 1947 Hindus and Sikhs used to be 36%, with your high breeding you will create more and more stans,,we had enough of you
            Reply
            1. B
              Bert Brech
              Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 pm
              Muslims have stan and Bangladesh, declared Muslim coutries, and about 60 other Muslim countries in the world. What country can look after Hindus except India?
              Reply
            2. P
              ProdyotPran
              Oct 25, 2016 at 7:37 am
              An illegal immigrant is an illegal immigrant Hindu or otherwise.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;But, if the state of India wishes to make a concessional distinction fearing that the Hindus are prosecuted in Bangladesh on the basis of their practised faith, then the Hindu illegal immigrants need to be accommodated and rehabilitated in India but with some strings attached.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;All the States in India will need to take a proportional share of such immigrants.lt;br/gt;Why should am face the burden?lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;Either all states agree to take proportional chunk, or none takes any.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;Let there be a national debate on the issue.lt;br/gt;Consult all the social stakeholders in each state.lt;br/gt;Let the Chief Ministers of all the States of India meet to discuss the issue under one roof.lt;br/gt;Let there be a consensus.lt;br/gt;And then, let the illegal Hindu Bangladeshi immigrants be distributed.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;This cannot be seen as an issue internal to am only.lt;br/gt;It is a national issue.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;I hope good sense will prevail.lt;br/gt;am cannot be thrown into another phase of social chaos and anarchy.
              Reply
            3. Load More Comments