• Associate Sponsor

Simply put: The fight over IAF’s fighters

The Indian Express explains the issues in the controversy over the deal to buy the Rafale warjets

Written by Sushant Singh | Updated: February 9, 2018 4:53 am
What is the Rafale jets controversy in Parliament On November 18, 2016, Minister of State for Defence Subhash Bhamre told Lok Sabha in a written reply that the “cost of each Rafale aircraft is around Rs 670 crore”.

The Indian Express explains the issues in the controversy over the deal to buy the Rafale warjets

What is the Rafale controversy about?

The Opposition parties have alleged that the NDA government bought 36 Rafale fighter aircraft, built by Dassault Aviation of France, under a direct government-to-government agreement at a much higher price than the one that was being negotiated for 126 aircraft by the previous UPA government under an open tender.

India’s intention to buy the 36 aircraft in “fly-away” condition was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his visit to France in April 2015 and, a few days later, then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar had announced that the earlier 126-fighter deal — stalled over price since 2012 — was dead. The deal for the 36 aircraft — a new acquisition — was signed by Parrikar and his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian on September 23, 2016.

The IAF had issued a tender for 126 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) in 2007, and at the end of a stringent selection process in 2012, Rafale fighters were chosen.

What is the Rafale jets controversy in Parliament Former Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian exchange documents of memorandum of understanding on the purchase of Rafale combat jets, at Hyderabad House in New Delhi on September 23, 2016 (Express Photo/Renuka Puri)

The Opposition has also alleged that the deal for the 36 aircraft does not include transfer of technology, whereas, in the older proposal, 108 of the 126 fighters were to be assembled by the Bengaluru-based Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL). The current deal, however, has a 50% offset component — Dassault has agreed to manufacture items worth 50% of the deal in India. But the Opposition alleges that the discharge of offsets has been done to favour a particular private Indian defence company.

The controversy sharpened on Monday after Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman declined to share the cost of the Rafale fighters under the new deal with Rajya Sabha. In her answer, she said that “As per Article 10 of the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) between the Government of India and the Government of France on purchase of Rafale aircraft, the protection of the classified information and material exchanged under IGA is governed by the provisions of the Security Agreement signed between the two nations in 2008.”

Read | Rahul Gandhi alleges scam: PM Modi personally got Rafale deal done

Click image to enlarge.

But hasn’t the government shared the price earlier with Parliament?

Yes, it has. On November 18, 2016, Minister of State for Defence Subhash Bhamre told Lok Sabha in a written reply that the “cost of each Rafale aircraft is around Rs 670 crore”. This is the basic price of each of the 36 fighters, without any add-ons or weapons systems. At the time of its signing two months earlier, the 36-aircraft deal was said to be worth around Rs 59,000 crore. On Wednesday, the Defence Ministry said in a statement that “in not revealing the item-wise details of the contract, the Government is merely following in letter and spirit the confidentiality provisions of a bilateral India-France Agreement of 2008 signed by the previous Government”.

And what exactly does the 2008 Agreement say?

Article 11(3) of the “Agreement between The Government of the Republic of India and The Government of the French Republic concerning the Protection of Classified Information and Material in the field of Defence”, signed in New Delhi on January 25, 2008, states: “For any contract or sub-contracting contract that includes classified information and material, a security annex shall be drawn up. In this annex, the competent security authority from the Party forwarding the information or the material, shall specify what has to be protected by the Receiving Party, as well as the corresponding classification level, applicable to it.”

Article 18(3) of the Agreement, however, stipulates that “This Agreement shall remain in force for a period of 10 years. It shall be renewed by tacit consent for new 5-year period unless one of the Parties notifies the other Party of its intention not to renew it in writing 6 months prior to the end of its current period of validity.”

The initial 10-year life of the Agreement ended on January 24 this year. It is not clear if it has been renewed by “tacit consent” by the government.

What is the Rafale jets controversy in Parliament India’s intention to buy the 36 aircraft in “fly-away” condition was announced by PM Narendra Modi during his visit to France in April 2015 (K Tokunaga/Dassault Aviation)

So, are no “item-wise details” of the contract available at all?

Immediately after the signing in September 2016, top Defence Ministry officials had given a break-up of the € 7.878 billion (approximately Rs 59,000 cr) deal: the basic cost of the 36 aircraft was € 3.402 billion (approximately Rs 670 crore per aircraft), the weaponry was for € 710 million, spare parts for € 1,800 million, weather and terrain compatibility fits for € 1,700 million, and performance based logistics support for € 353 million.

OK, what was the price that the previous government had negotiated of each Rafale aircraft?

No official figure was ever given. The price for 126 aircraft that was quoted nearly a decade ago, was never finalised, and no contract was signed or executed. No details of what was included in the per-aircraft price quoted in the aborted deal are known.

Is it possible to make a comparison of the prices, then?

Not with any accuracy. Some sort of assessment of whether the current price is reasonable, can be made if the “benchmark price” decided upon by the Defence Ministry’s Contract Negotiation Committees (CNC) for the two cases are made public. Before a company’s commercial offer is opened, a benchmark price is fixed to assess the reasonableness of the price quoted by the company. On its part, the Ministry has declared that “the deal secured by the (current) Government is better in terms of capability, price, equipment, delivery, maintenance, training, etc”. This was also the line that Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman took in her press briefing last November, during which she said the Ministry would provide comparative prices.

And has it been the practice generally to share the cost of defence deals with Parliament?

In several cases, costs have been shared; in others, those details have been kept secret for reasons of national security. But the government is duty-bound to share the full pricing details with the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament.

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Feb 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm
    'Et tu, Indian Express!' -) Shame on you being "गोदी मीडिया".
    1. A
      Feb 11, 2018 at 7:00 pm
      "न तो मैं खाऊंगा/खाऊंगी, न तो मैं किसीको ( मेरे करीबी दोस्तों को छोड़के. ) खाने दूंगा/दूंगी, हा हा हा.. "
      1. S
        Feb 11, 2018 at 10:46 am
        If the Pappu regime had continued and the apology for Defence Ministership Antony had continued, the main weapons platform of the Indian Army, Airforce and Navy would have become stones and sticks! These jokers are trying to pull down Modi who is not corrupt like them!
        1. Sunil
          Feb 10, 2018 at 12:56 am
          Indian Express when many years ago you created hoax for bofors for BJP against congress government.Now you are trying to clarify BJP sins point by point.Stop bloody chanting modi modi Otherwise u will be first one to pakodas instead of newspapers.I really admired IE.but now hate.
          1. R
            Ramesh Nittoor
            Feb 9, 2018 at 11:34 pm
            It is quite possible that Swadeshiwallahs within BJP are rooting for an Indian partner in the offset deal. If this Congress effort enables neutralizing any such political pressuring, it shall serve the long term security interests of India. To depoliticize any issue, it needs either law making, preferably via consensus route or a public showdown to neutralize lobby pressures. On second thoughts, it seems that Congress raising this matter could be good for India. At the same time, if Rafale deal includes high al ude, precision drop capability, it would be a significant improvement. Per US reports, India at present has only gravity drop for its strategic nal. The personal touch of PM Modi, if this is indeed the case, has to be considered as a game changer. There is still room to believe that both parties are acting responsibly in this national security context.
            1. Load More Comments