2G spectrum scam: The shadow over former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh

In February 2011, Manmohan Singh said that “coalition compulsions” had forced him to make compromises.

By: Express News Service | Updated: December 21, 2017 6:03 pm
Former-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Former-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh whose image took a battering over the 2G scam.

The 2G spectrum allocation scam rocked the UPA II government. Then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s image was battered in the ensuing storm. In February 2011, Singh said that “coalition compulsions” had forced him to make compromises.

Raja …was the choice of the DMK and I had no reason to feel that anything seriously wrong has been done. I did not feel that I had the authority to object to Raja’s entry although complaints were coming from some companies who were not benefited…I was not in a position to make up my mind,” Singh said to senior television journalists at a media interaction on February 17, 2011.

Also Read | The defence of the accused in 2G spectrum scam: No personal gains, what about others, said those in dock

Six years later, the CBI, making its final arguments in the case, defended Singh, stating that A Raja, then-Telecom Minister, had “misled” Singh. The CBI argued that Raja wrote a letter on November 2, 2007, apparently “misrepresenting facts and fraudulently justifying his decision” regarding the cut-off date on September 25, on the grounds that on September 25 itself, an announcement of the cut-off date appeared in newspapers. It also alleged that Raja apparently misled Singh by “incorrectly” stating the opinion of the Ministry of Law and Justice to refer the matter to the Empowered Group of Ministers “to be out of context”.

Also Read | The prosecution’s case in 2G spectrum scam: New cut-off dates, suspect intent and a Rs 200-crore bribe

On November 2, 2011, Singh sent a letter to Raja, which appropriately flagged the issue of the “processing of a large number of applications received for fresh licences against the backdrop of inadequate spectrum to cater to overall demand.”

The suggestion from the high office of the Prime Minister, that availability of spectrum had to be assessed before committing to issue of licences, and that licence without requisite spectrum meant nothing to a telecom operator, were, however, brushed aside by the accused A Raja,” Special Judge O P Saini had said, while putting Raja on trial.

In his order, Saini stated that on the receipt of the letter from Singh, Raja “immediately” called his personal secretary R K Chandolia and “drafted a response to the letter…in the night itself”. “This important matter relating to policy decisions of the DoT, which required serious consideration by the DoT in terms of the policy issues was not even dealt with in the files of the department,” Saini noted in his order on charge.

The main accused in the 2G spectrum case, Andimuthu Raja, the former Minister for Communications and Information Technology, is mobbed as he emerges from the CBI office in New Delhi in 2010. (Oinam Anand/Express Archive)

In his response, Raja misrepresented, with a dishonest intention, the fact stating that, ‘there was, and is, no single deviation or departure in the rules and procedures contemplated in all the decisions taken by the ministry and as such full transparency is being maintained..and further assure you the same in future also’,” Saini observed.

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App

  1. V
    Vish
    Dec 21, 2017 at 8:04 pm
    Well, can one explains the vagaries of weather and those of CBI courts? Again, how innocently the saint-faced congi leader claims innocence! Under his guidance and ex-FM, the investigation started and court case was filed, Raja quit his post, SC cancelled all licenses. Country never forgets the same. Now, he hobnobbed with people from enemy and terrorist country, without informing govt. so much for his innocence.
    (2)(2)
    Reply
    1. Master Firmhardhand
      Dec 21, 2017 at 9:24 pm
      Modi travelled to Pakistan to hobnob with terrorist sponsors
      (2)(1)
      Reply
    2. D
      Dr Vikram
      Dec 21, 2017 at 7:15 pm
      So ultimately, -There was no black buck who was murdered by Salman Khan. -No one was sleeping on the footpath on that fateful day. -Salman Khan was not the murderer of footpath person as he is hero not a villain. -No one was corrupt in this f king 2G case. -Asaram bapu is not guilty. -Baba Gurmeet Ram Rahim is innocent. -Subrahmaniyam Swami is not a big mouthed person last but not least, -Modi ji is not feku,. Only we are.
      (2)(0)
      Reply
      1. Mohan Krishnaswamy
        Dec 21, 2017 at 1:23 pm
        Mr SHAM YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPY IF THE JUDGE WAS INSTALLED BY NDA. THEY ARE NOW TRYING TO DO THE SAME. DON'T WORRY IT WILL HAPPEN SOON AND YOU CAN REOPEN THE CASE AND MAKE YOUR JUDGE TO PUNISH THEM.
        (2)(0)
        Reply
        1. Ravishankar Balasubramanian
          Dec 21, 2017 at 12:14 pm
          Hmm, there were glaring gaps to the naked eye. I feel our investigation agencies goofed up to make a water tight case. This gives even more confidence to the corrupt that the systems have glaring holes ensuring guilty be punished. We have seen the brazen corruption by BJP. Police reforms are critical.
          (6)(3)
          Reply
          1. S
            Sham
            Dec 21, 2017 at 12:13 pm
            It is a shame verdict, pronounced by judge(s) installed by the UPA government.
            (3)(8)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments