Before Rs 1000-crore Mahabharata, these were India’s most expensive films

Malayalam superstar Mohanlal's Mahabharata based on Randamoozham will be the biggest motion picture-ever produced in India.

Written by Manoj Kumar R | Bengaluru | Updated: April 18, 2017 6:41 pm
Mohanlal’s The Mahabharata will be India’s most expensive film.

We were still not done with which is the most expensive Indian film ever — Baahubali 2 or 2.0 — and south industry has dropped another bomb. Mohanlal has announced that he will be a part of a film based on MT Vasudevan Nair’s Randamoozham, called The Mahabharata, which will be made on a mammoth budget of Rs 1000 crore. While we are a long way off from Hollywood — quick perspective, Avengers: Infinity Wars 1 and 2 is said to have a budget of over Rs 6000 crore — a bigger budget is ensuring that Indian films look and feel world-class.

Filmmaking is a very expensive business now more than ever. In India, a major portion of the budget of a film is spent on roping in a leading actor, who can guarantee the producers a minimum success at the box office. Instead, the filmmakers should be spending their money on special effects and technologies that enhance the film viewing experience of the audiences. Like Hollywood studios’ focus on making the film an astonishing viewing experience. Some of the Indian filmmakers like SS Rajamouli, Shankar and Malayalam superstar Mohanlal are rewriting the rules of producing a film. Here are their films, ranked according to budget.

Read | Forget Baahubali 2 and 2.0, Mohanlal to star as Bheem in Rs 1000-crore The Mahabharata

2.0

Director Shankar made Jeans 20 years ago, which was made on a budget of Rs 20 crore. And the director has come a long way since then. His upcoming film 2.0, starring Rajinikanth and Akshay Kumar, is touted to be the most expensive film made in India (at least until The Mahabharata was announced). The early estimates suggested that the film will cost its producers more than Rs 400 crore and a large chunk of the budget goes to CGI.

Baahubali 1 and Baahubali 2

It has always been very expensive to make director SS Rajamouli’s vision a reality. He upped the ante in terms of productions with his blockbuster franchise, Baahubali. The film producers, Shobu Yarlagadda and Prasad Devineni, have spent a whopping about Rs 400 crore in the making of these films. As Baahubali 2 is ready to land, its trailers have already made a buzz with the high-quality CGI and production values.

Ra.One

 

Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan’s superhero film Ra.One was celebrated as the most expensive film at the time. The production cost of the film was pegged at Rs 150 crore. However, it did not live up to the expectations at the box office.

Enthiran

Director Shankar is touted to be the James Cameron of India for the sheer scale he brings to his films. And that costs money. In 2009, Enthiran, starring Rajinikanth, was made at a budget of Rs 132 crore.

Kochadaiyaan

Superstar Rajinikanth’s Kochadaiyaan was the first India film to be made using the motion capture technology. A technology which was used in Hollywood films like The Adventures of Tintin and Avatar. However, the final output was not up to its Hollywood counterparts. The film was made on a budget of Rs 125 crore.

 

Krrish 3

The was the most expensive film starring Hrithik Roshan in the Krrish franchise. The Roshans had spent Rs 115 crore on this superhero film, which had an all-star cast, including Priyanka Chopra, Vivek Oberoi, Kangana Ranaut among others.

I

It is Shankar again. His second outing with actor Vikram, I, is one of the highest grossing Tamil films of all time. The film with the huge budget of Rs 100 crore, went on to collected a whopping Rs 225 crore worldwide. In the film, Vikram was seen in three avatars, including a hunchback.

Puli

Many films don’t share the actual budget. However, based on estimates, industry observers arrived at a consensus that the Vijay film was made at the cost of Rs 100 crore.

Dhoom 3

The third instalment in the popular heist movie series clearly had a higher budget than its predecessors. However, there are conflicting reports about the actual number. While many reports suggest it was made at a budget of Rs 175 crore, some reports peg it at Rs 125 crore.

Mughal-e-Azam

This timeless classic deserves a special mention. The film was made at Rs 15 million on a never-seen-before scale in 1960. It may not be a big budget now. But at the time of its release, it was a big deal. Probably, it gave courage to other filmmakers to push the envelope further.

For all the latest Entertainment News, download Indian Express App now

  1. S
    Shuresh
    May 17, 2017 at 10:06 am
    You missed sangamithra which has budget of about 400 cr
    Reply
    1. S
      Shubham Rajelli
      Apr 28, 2017 at 4:41 pm
      Somehow the author of this article doesn't know the difference between budget and box-office. Shame on journalism
      Reply
      1. I
        Indian
        Apr 19, 2017 at 10:10 am
        Better donate ame money for humanity. We have millions of red light beggars & homeless peoples.
        Reply
        1. M
          Malayy
          Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 pm
          Well it's a billionaire producing. I don't think they think about wasting their money on other om people. They're probably doing this for the fame that comes with it. We can't help that behaviour. I doubt if I will give my money to the poor if I become a billionaire. I might give some to charity. But not a lot. I wouldn't want to spend my hard earned money on others. This is the nature of most rich people.
          Reply
        2. R
          Ramji Ram
          Apr 19, 2017 at 8:42 am
          ASTROLOGER` ALL` PROBLEM` SOLUTION LOVE MARRIAGE SPECIALIST BABA JI 91-7073636169
          Reply
          1. A
            Ashamed Jnr
            Apr 19, 2017 at 2:57 am
            All the Best.
            Reply
            1. J
              Jayaprakash Pk
              Apr 18, 2017 at 9:02 pm
              I wonder how can an expensive film like the one reported above, can collect a portion of the expenditure if made in Malayalam. Even if the movie is made simultaneously in Tamil, Telugu, Hindi, Kannada and in English, I do not think it can collect so much of money to meet the expenses projected. To make it in other languages, the lead roles of different characters have to be acted by actors who are known to audience. I do not think Mohanlal acting in the top lead role will be accepted by people speaking other languages as he is not po r among them. It is mainly because Mohanlal has not acted many films in other languages but concentrated in Malayalam. This is not to under estimate his acting talents and he still is one of the superb actors of Indian cinema.
              Reply
              1. M
                Malayy
                Apr 19, 2017 at 4:51 pm
                You are correct at some parts. But think about Baahubali. Prabhas didn't act in any Hindi or North Indian movie before, and he still hasn't. Yet his movie Baahubali managed to get to the '3rd highest grossing in India' spot. He wasn't known among the north audiences, or even in states like Karnataka, Kerala etc. He became a humongous star after Baahubali.
                Reply
              2. S
                Srikanth B
                Apr 18, 2017 at 6:11 pm
                Right now, 2570 Crore is the highest amount invested in a Hollywood movie. not 6000 crores. s: en.wikipedia /wiki/List_of_most_expensive_films
                Reply
                1. M
                  Malayy
                  Apr 19, 2017 at 4:53 pm
                  I think it's adjusted for inflation as well.
                  Reply
                2. S
                  Sreedharan
                  Apr 18, 2017 at 4:55 pm
                  Moreover the novel name " amoozham" should be retained to admire MT Vasudevan Nair Sir. Mohanlal is trying to have full compliment on his name. Earlier we heard Mammooty was casted and then how the twist ??? Really biased !!!
                  Reply
                  1. C
                    cinebuff
                    Apr 18, 2017 at 6:55 pm
                    We have been hearing the news for years that amoozham is being adapted as a movie and Mohanlal is playing the lead role as Bhima . Just because you don't like that actor, don't spread incorrect news.
                    Reply
                    1. M
                      Malayy
                      Apr 19, 2017 at 4:55 pm
                      I heard that too. But what I heard was that Mohanlal was Bheema and Mammootty as someone else and Amitabh Bachchan as Bhismar
                      Reply
                    2. S
                      Sreedharan
                      Apr 18, 2017 at 4:39 pm
                      Finally Pulimurukan has come with new number. Mohanlal don't have a body stature to play the role. He is already G pappa. Some youngsters should be selected. At least Momooty has the "g " look. But this bulky shaped glamour less actor won't suit for legendary role of Bhim. Since Big B is not available to lead Bhismar role, Anil Perumbavoor would take up that we presume. Even during the national games at Trivandrum we suffered a lot to watch the Magician's Kingship roles on screen. His face and voice won't suit for epic roles. He is a good actor to his potentials. We accept it. Even with all new technologies it is too much to endure !!!. Oh Lord Krishna save us !!!
                      Reply
                      1. C
                        cinebuff
                        Apr 18, 2017 at 6:47 pm
                        Sorry who is mammootty?
                        Reply
                        1. M
                          Malayy
                          Apr 19, 2017 at 4:57 pm
                          stop playing stupid, Cinebuff. Mammootty is as po r as Mohanlal, or even more po r. He received more national awards for best actor than mohanlal. He received a best actor national award for even a hindi/English film. And so most po r Malayalam actor in north.
                        2. N
                          nithin
                          Apr 19, 2017 at 12:56 am
                          Believe me we will they needing unanimous support from each and everyone for this movie like in the case of bahubali. I believe there has been no actors movie succeeded with just their fans. So please don't post any negative. After the movie releases you are en led to criticize as much as you need. Please let them make the movie as they like.
                          Reply
                          1. a
                            aswin007
                            Apr 19, 2017 at 1:09 pm
                            s like u look only at the glamorous quotient of actors and actress. As a result we created an industry called bollywood , which produces only .Only when audience turn intelligent we will be able to produce world cl films , As long as stupids like u r here we will never appreciate acting but only looks !!
                            Reply
                            1. M
                              Malayy
                              Apr 19, 2017 at 5:00 pm
                              Well, Sreedharan, I do hope that Mammootty is cast as the lead role. But, as Mohanlal has been announced for it, let's hope that the movie turns out good for what it is. And let's hope that lalettan gets a bit er so as to suit his role's physical strength. Well we wont surely get a six pack but as least a lot more weight loss would be fine. Also, we can't change his voice. He voice is inimitatable, just like Mammookka's. no one else has these voices.
                              Reply
                            2. Load More Comments