Ae Dil Hai Mushkil: Single-theatre owners’ panel calls for ban on Fawad film

Ae Dil Hai Mushkil: The ban is reportedly applicable to single-screen theatres that are part of Mumbai territory, which includes, besides Maharashtra, parts of Gujarat, Goa and Karnataka.

Written by Alaka Sahani | Mumbai | Updated: October 15, 2016 9:52 am
Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, Ae Dil Hai Mushkil BAN, Ae Dil Hai Mushkil fawad khan, karan johar film Cinema Owners and Exhibitors’ Association of India (COEAI) on Friday announced that theatres under its ambit will not screen movies featuring Pakistani actors and technicians. And this will affect the scheduled release of Karan Johar’s Fawad Khan-starrer Ae Dil Hai Mushkil on October 28.

AHEAD of the scheduled release of Karan Johar’s Ae Dil Hai Mushkil on October 28, the Cinema Owners and Exhibitors’ Association of India (COEAI) on Friday announced that theatres under its ambit will not screen movies featuring Pakistani actors and technicians.

In a circular issued Friday, COEAI said, “Keeping in mind the patriotic feeling and national interest, we request all our member-exhibitors from (withholding) screening (of) any movie that has involvement of Pakistani artistes, technicians, etc.” Pakistani actor Fawad Khan plays a key role in Ae Dil Hai Mushkil. The ban is reportedly applicable to single-screen theatres that are part of Mumbai territory, which includes, besides Maharashtra, parts of Gujarat, Goa and Karnataka. While the scope of the ban remains uncertain as of now, as other industry bodies are yet to come to a decision, COEAI stated, “We are in the process of requesting other associations connected with film industry to support these sentiments.”

Any such diktat will also affect films such as Raees, starring Shah Rukh Khan and Pakistani actor Mahira Khan, and Gauri Shinde’s Dear Zindagi, which is supposed to have singer-actor Ali Zafar in a cameo. COEAI president Nitin Datar said the ban would spare greater losses producers and exhibitors would have suffered from vandalism had they screened the movies. The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena had earlier given an ultimatum to Pakistani actors to leave India.

Welcoming COEAI’s decision, Mumbai BJP chief Ashish Shelar on Friday stated in a letter to External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, “The government should not give them (Pakistani artistes) visa and work permit when there is no work (here).” The Indian Motion Pictures Producers Association (IMPPA), which had issued a circular on September 30 “unanimously appealing” to all producers to not hire Pakistani actors and technicians, has criticised COEAI’s decision. “Keeping the interest of producers in mind, IMPPA had spared completed projects like Ae Dil Hai Mushkil and Raees, and issued the restriction on employing Pakistani artistes in future projects,” IMPPA president T P Aggarwal said.

Aggarwal said this move will be a setback to financiers and producers whose movies are already complete. A strong appeal in support of Johar also came from the Film and Television Producers Guild of India. In an appeal, Mukesh Bhatt, the guild’s president, said, “We would urge the central government as well as all states to appreciate that film producers who have already shot their films, or are in the process of completing their unfinished films, should not end up paying (a) heavy price.”

Ae Dil Hai Mushkil has been cleared by CBFC with a U/A certificate. Welcoming COEAI’s decision, all 18 single-screen threare owners in Pune, under the umbrella of Pune Exhibitors’ Association, said they will not screen the Karan Johar film. Prakash Chaphalkar, member of All-India Multiplex Association, however, said multiplex operators have not taken any decision yet.

In Chandigarh, Vijay Bhardwaj, spokesperson for several Hindu organisations for Punjab and Chandigarh region, said, “We have spoken with all Hindu sanghathans — Shiv Sena, VHP, Raksha Samiti and others, and have decided not to allow any film starring any Pakistani actor.” B B Arora, president of Northern India Motion Picture Association (of cinema owners and distributors), said, “We will go along with whatever multiplex cinema owners and distributors decide.”

Inputs from ENS Mumbai, Pune, Chandigarh

For all the latest Entertainment News, download Indian Express App

  1. L
    Laal
    Oct 15, 2016 at 2:48 am
    Then everytime the indian army kills kashmiris or attack kashmiris they should ban all indian actors as well. This ban is juvenile. Considering the amount of human rights violations the indian government has committed.
    Reply
    1. D
      Dash
      Oct 15, 2016 at 6:59 am
      The headline of the report is misleading. Noone has banned it and the ociation has only decided not to screen the movie. Consumer is the king and to respect their sentiments,this step has been taken. The is a message for others. The message is that stanis can work here only of their country stops exporting terror.
      Reply
      1. A
        Aditya
        Oct 15, 2016 at 5:17 am
        Don't use foul language on public platform. You yourself wrote that you are fan of some celebrities then how the fan of Ajay Devgn be called CHAMCHA?
        Reply
        1. C
          cvm
          Oct 15, 2016 at 4:37 am
          Good . They have to stop screening films of Salman , SRK and others who are directly or morally supporting terrorists and stan.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Film products, co actors. Distributors and exhibitors all should boycott these anti India people.
          Reply
          1. P
            Patel
            Oct 15, 2016 at 5:25 am
            Are you khans prosute
            Reply
            1. J
              J.Ramakrishna
              Oct 15, 2016 at 2:20 am
              Hope MNS will do some thing to teach a lesson to Khans ociation .....
              Reply
              1. J
                J.Ramakrishna
                Oct 15, 2016 at 2:15 am
                I wish none to see the picture and, teach a lesson to Karan Johar
                Reply
                1. K
                  K
                  Oct 15, 2016 at 5:36 am
                  They ban Dhoni's movie without any valid reason and we are casting stanis in our film... we have learn from them ..
                  Reply
                  1. D
                    desiaaddmi
                    Oct 15, 2016 at 1:35 am
                    also ban the supporters of our country enemy stan's actors ......pehley bheetar ki bimari ko theek karna padega......
                    Reply
                    1. A
                      Ashok Mazumdar
                      Oct 15, 2016 at 1:25 am
                      Dev Gun Zindaabad.
                      Reply
                      1. M
                        m
                        Oct 15, 2016 at 5:37 am
                        Pkistan ke sath hai mushkil
                        Reply
                        1. M
                          m
                          Oct 15, 2016 at 5:39 am
                          Today - no body is hungry fro film with thousands of free movies in all language with suble available on the net --enjoy
                          Reply
                          1. R
                            Raider
                            Oct 15, 2016 at 5:54 am
                            Hahahahaha... Ajay Devgan's shivay going to be released with this ADHM film so ADHM is a scapegoat. Filmi people also playing politics now everywhere politics to show each other superior or inferior. Just to degrade one and others movies bollywood also supporting intolerance among themselves. Actually Fawad Khan not the reason the reason is stardom who is big who is small or who should be big who should be small.
                            Reply
                            1. G
                              Girish Rao
                              Oct 15, 2016 at 5:16 am
                              Human right violations are done by the kashmiri separatist people on their children by making them stand in front of the army and hurling stones...forces are firing rubber pellets in self defence...Had it been AK47 none would have dared out its the restraint which is causing the problem...
                              Reply
                              1. G
                                Girish Rao
                                Oct 15, 2016 at 5:12 am
                                It was Karan decision to hire Fawad Khan in his film...It was Fawad Khans decision to support his stan and his terrorists by not condemning them....Its the screen owners decision not to screen shows in their theatres.... When every body is deciding for their cause why blame the COEAI we salute your decision and your stand...We Indians are also not dying to watch Pak artists and get entertained by them....
                                Reply
                                1. S
                                  Sanjeev Singal
                                  Oct 15, 2016 at 6:29 am
                                  Did you ever wonder why Indian TV Channels are not as much hysterical about revoking of stan's MFN status as about sending back Pak Artists from india?lt;br/gt;. lt;br/gt;It's because Pak MFN status benefits Modi's friends.
                                  Reply
                                  1. T
                                    Thomas George
                                    Oct 15, 2016 at 6:30 am
                                    Yeah. The best people to learn from are the stanis. Are you mad?
                                    Reply
                                    1. T
                                      Thomas George
                                      Oct 15, 2016 at 6:35 am
                                      You know, Karan Johar may have taken the decision to hire Fawad Khan at the time PM Modi was visiting stan and exchanging pleasantries with Nawaz Sharif. Fawad Alam must also have been issued a work VISA by the government. The producers have already spent money on the movie, they will lose money -- Fawad Khan has already been paid, and loses nothing. stan certainly has nothing to lose. Maybe, we are signalling investors everywhere that we are subject to *mobocracy* than rule of law.
                                      Reply
                                      1. Load More Comments