The Bombay High Court on Friday noted that the BMC had clearly submitted before the court that the Shankar Lok building in Vakola, that collapsed on Friday, was “in a dilapidated condition.”
The corporation had urgently mentioned the case on Friday to inform the court about the collapse of the building, that had been embroiled in a legal battle between the corporation and building residents Shinda, Sudha and Satyan Sridharan, who refused to vacate the building for over six years.
Justices Anoop Mohta and M S Sonak noted that the case had been pending since 2008 with interim reliefs as the petitioners, the Sridharans, had refused to vacate the building.
- Twitter War Between Congress Leader Amarinder Singh & Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal
- Life Of Actor-Dancer Ashwini Ekbote Who Died During A Performance
- Idea Exchange With Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh
- PM Narendra Modi Bats For Equal Rights : Here What He Said On Triple Talaq
- Uncle Shivpal Targets Akhilesh, Claims CM Told Him He Will Form Another Party
- Pakistan Continues To Violate Ceasefire In RS Pura
- Samajwadi Party’s internal fight divides SP
- Cyrus Mistry Removed As Chairman of Tata Sons: Here’s What Happened
- Wreath Laying Ceremony Of Slain Soldier Sushil Kumar Observed
- Virat Kohli Powers India Home With Unbeaten 154
- Pakistan Resorts To Heavy Mortar Shelling, 1 BSF Jawan Dead, 3 Injured
- Bigg Boss 10 Weekend Ka Vaar: Priyanka Jagga Evicted
- Here’s How Much Army Welfare Fund Has After MNS Demanded Rs 5 Cr To Cast Pak Artistes
- Shiv Sena Chief Uddhav Thackeray Take A Jibe At MNS: Here’s What He Said
- Samajwadi Party Crisis Deepens: Here’s How It Will Impact UP Polls
The judges cited an order passed by another bench of the High Court on October 25, 2013, in which the court had observed: “If any mishap takes place or any untoward incident occurs, the Municipal Corporation will not be held responsible for the consequences qua the petitioner, as the petitioner continues to reside in the structure, which the corporation claims is in ruinous and dangerous state, at her own risk.”
The court on Friday directed the civic body to take necessary action in the subjudice matter. “The respondent – corporation – to take immediate action and all necessary steps. No permission is required for the same.”
In 2010, when the BMC attempted to carry out extensive propping on the building to prevent it from collapsing, Sridharan alleged that the appointed contractors were consciously breaking parts of the building that would weaken the structure. Sridharan, in her petition filed before the high court, furnished a structural audit report of a private agency, which said the condition of the building had deteriorated because of neglect and lack of repairs by the owner, Ashok Mastekar.