The Allahabad High Court on Thursday admitted the appeals filed by dentist couple Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, challenging their conviction and life sentence in the Aarushi-Hemraj double murder case.
Hearing on the bail pleas, which were submitted along with the appeals, will begin on March 11.
Aarushi was found dead in her Noida home on the morning of May 17, 2008, while Hemraj’s body was found a day later on the terrace. The couple was convicted on November 25, 2013, and given a life term by a special CBI court in Ghaziabad.
Two criminal appeals, along with the Talwars’ bail applications, came up for hearing before a division bench of Justices V K Shukla and Karunanand Bajpayee.
Passing identical orders for both, the bench said, “One month time is accorded to Additional Government Advocate and Anurag Khanna (CBI counsel), to file objections (to the bail) in consonance with the provisions…
- Here’s Why Delhi-NCR Gets Pollution Code On Lines Of Beijing
- PM Modi Is More Interested In TRP Politics Rahul Gandhi At Congress Parliamentary Meet
- Bigg Boss 10 December 1 Review: Priyanka Jagga Succeeds In Her Divide And Rule Strategy
- Kahaani 2 Audience Reaction: Vidya Balan Starrer Thriller Gets Mixed Reviews
- Find Out What PM Modi Said About Demonetisation On LinkedIn
- Row Over West Bengal ”Military Coup” Issue Escalates: Who Said What
- Here’s How Mohammad Kaif Replied To Virender Sehwag’s Birthday Wish On Twitter
- West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s Flight Reportedly Had Low Fuel: Here’s What Happened
- Reliance Jio Welcome Offer Extended Till March 31, JioMoney Launched
- Uri Attackers Came From Pakistan, Establishes Digital Data
- Bigg Boss 10 Nov 30 Episode Review: Captaincy Brings Differences In Manoj Punjabi & Manveer Gurjar
- Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi’s Official Twitter Handle Hacked
- After Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter Handle, Congress Official Twitter Account Hacked
- 3 Dead As Army Helicopter Crashes In Sukna In West Bengal
- BJP, Congress Engage In War Of Words Over Nagrota Attack: Find Out More
Copy of the same be served upon Vikram D Chauhan, advocate, so that, in case he so feels, he may file rebuttal in the same.” The court also summoned the original lower court record.