Observing that judges are not used to hiccups and inconveniences in their travel, a district consumer forum last week slapped Indian Railways with a fine of Rs 60,000 for causing discomfort to a retired judge and his family during a train journey to Bhopal two years ago.
In November 2012, Justice Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, who is the Chairman of the Company Law Board, and his family boarded a train to Bhopal.
- Twitter War Between Congress Leader Amarinder Singh & Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal
- Life Of Actor-Dancer Ashwini Ekbote Who Died During A Performance
- Idea Exchange With Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh
- PM Narendra Modi Bats For Equal Rights : Here What He Said On Triple Talaq
- Uncle Shivpal Targets Akhilesh, Claims CM Told Him He Will Form Another Party
- Pakistan Continues To Violate Ceasefire In RS Pura
- Samajwadi Party’s internal fight divides SP
- Cyrus Mistry Removed As Chairman of Tata Sons: Here’s What Happened
- Wreath Laying Ceremony Of Slain Soldier Sushil Kumar Observed
- Virat Kohli Powers India Home With Unbeaten 154
- Pakistan Resorts To Heavy Mortar Shelling, 1 BSF Jawan Dead, 3 Injured
- Bigg Boss 10 Weekend Ka Vaar: Priyanka Jagga Evicted
- Here’s How Much Army Welfare Fund Has After MNS Demanded Rs 5 Cr To Cast Pak Artistes
- Shiv Sena Chief Uddhav Thackeray Take A Jibe At MNS: Here’s What He Said
- Samajwadi Party Crisis Deepens: Here’s How It Will Impact UP Polls
He claimed before the New Delhi District Forum that the doors to his coach were shut at the time of boarding and his seats were transferred to another coach without intimating him.
The judge also claimed that the defence taken by the railways before the forum was a lie. The Railways claimed that the allotted seats had been changed owing to the fact that they had been reserved under the VIP quota. The forum noted that the ticket did not indicate any such VIP status.
The forum also noted that the written arguments by the railways “failed to show any communication” about “change in seating plan” and why the coach was locked. Holding the railways responsible for “deficiency of services” under the Consumer Protection Act and lying during the arguments, the forum awarded Rs 50,000 as compensation and Rs 10,000 as litigation expenses.
“These facts clearly show an attempt… to accommodate some other persons in place of reserved seats for complainants… resulting in avoidable hardship, inconvenience, humiliation and harassment to complainant — judges who are not used to such hiccups and inconvenience in journeys… We hold the opposite party guilty of deficiency and award punitive damages for resorting to falsehood …,” a three-member panel of judges C K Chaturvedi and members S R Choudhary and Asha Kumar said.