Observing that judges are not used to hiccups and inconveniences in their travel, a district consumer forum last week slapped Indian Railways with a fine of Rs 60,000 for causing discomfort to a retired judge and his family during a train journey to Bhopal two years ago.
In November 2012, Justice Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, who is the Chairman of the Company Law Board, and his family boarded a train to Bhopal.
He claimed before the New Delhi District Forum that the doors to his coach were shut at the time of boarding and his seats were transferred to another coach without intimating him.
The judge also claimed that the defence taken by the railways before the forum was a lie. The Railways claimed that the allotted seats had been changed owing to the fact that they had been reserved under the VIP quota. The forum noted that the ticket did not indicate any such VIP status.
- Home Minister Rajnath Singh Assures Safety Of All Tourists Stranded On Havelock Island
- Government To Waive Service Tax On Debit, Credit Card Transactions Of Up To Rs 2,000
- President Pranab Mukherjee Criticises Parliament Disruptions Over Demonetisation
- Pakistan International Airlines Flight Carrying Over 40 Passenger On Board Crashes
- Shah Rukh Khan On Raees Clash With Kaabil: It’s Impossible To Have A Solo Release In India
- US-President Elect Donald Trump Named TIME’s Person Of The Year 2016
- O. Panneerselvam: 10 Things You Need To Know
- PM Narendra Modi Slams Opposition For Not Letting Parliament Function
- Nawazuddin Siddiqui On Working In Raees: Was Nervous To Shoot With Shah Rukh Khan
- Bathinda Dancer Murder: Video Showing Accused Opening Fire At Marriage
- 5 Lesser Known Facts About Sasikala Natarajan
- Congress Leader Shashi Tharoor’s Delhi Home Burgled: Here’s What Happened
- Reserve Bank Of India Keeps Repo Rate Unchanged Post Demonetisation
- Bigg Boss 10 Dec 06 Review: Swami Om Pees In Kitchen
- Lenovo k6 Power Video Review
The forum also noted that the written arguments by the railways “failed to show any communication” about “change in seating plan” and why the coach was locked. Holding the railways responsible for “deficiency of services” under the Consumer Protection Act and lying during the arguments, the forum awarded Rs 50,000 as compensation and Rs 10,000 as litigation expenses.
“These facts clearly show an attempt… to accommodate some other persons in place of reserved seats for complainants… resulting in avoidable hardship, inconvenience, humiliation and harassment to complainant — judges who are not used to such hiccups and inconvenience in journeys… We hold the opposite party guilty of deficiency and award punitive damages for resorting to falsehood …,” a three-member panel of judges C K Chaturvedi and members S R Choudhary and Asha Kumar said.