If acquitted of rape, should man be termed rape case survivor, asks court

The observation came when a rape victim had retracted her statement and turned hostile in court.

Written by Kaunain Sheriff M | New Delhi | Published:August 27, 2014 12:38 am

A Delhi court, while acquitting a man of rape charges, posed the question— whether persons acquitted of rape charges ‘honourably’ should be addressed as ‘rape case survivors’. The observation came in a case where the alleged rape victim had retracted her statement and turned hostile in court.

Additional Sessions Judge Nivedita Anil Sharma, while pronouncing the verdict, stated, “I would also like to mention that in recent times, a new expression is being used for a rape victim — that is a rape survivor. A woman, who has levelled allegations of rape, is now called rape survivor.

In the present case, the accused has been aquitted of the charge of rape as the prosecutrix retracted and turned hostile. In the circumstances, should an acquitted accused, who has been acquitted honourably, be addressed as a rape case survivor?”

The judge also observed that there is much to “ponder” about the “veracity” of the rape cases. The court also made observations on the “hue and cry” being raised that courts are not convicting the rape accused and said courts are not “swayed by emotions” and “reporting in the media”.

“It would not be out of place to mention that today, there is public outrage and a hue and cry is being raised everywhere that courts are not convicting the rape accused… it should not be ignored that the court has to confine itself to the ambit of law as well as testimonies of the witnesses and is not to be swayed by emotions or reporting in the media,” the judge said.

The observations come in a case where Ashwani Jaswal was accused of raping the woman after promising to marry her. Jaiswal was also accused of criminal breach of trust as it was alleged the victim has given approximately Rs 90 lakh and, when she demanded the money back, he refused.

However, the alleged victim, while deposing before the court, retracted and said the accused had not committed any offence and that she had filed the complaint before the police at the instance of her “well wisher” and on his “wrong advice”. She also deposed before the court that they had established physical relations with her consent.

“The alleged victim, who is the star witness, has turned hostile and has not supported the prosecution case and, more importantly, has not assigned any criminal role to the accused. The prosecution case is closed,” the court said.

For all the latest Cities News, download Indian Express App

  1. T
    trivenibalajidham
    Nov 9, 2014 at 10:54 am
    BREAKING NEWSThere was a False implication on Mr. Dharam ParkashKapoor Court istant of Hon’ble SUPREME COURT OF INDIA @Priest/Sevak/Babaji/Guruji (Triveni Balaji Dham, Timarpur Delhi) U/s376/328/506 IPC FIR No. 105/2011 dated 15th May, 2011 of PSTimarpur, Delhi, who is an Employee of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India andhas now been Acquitted on 8th day of September 2014 by the Hon’bleTrial Court of Ms. Kaveri Baweja, ASJ, FTC-2, Tis Hazari, Delhi and releasedfrom the Judicial Custody on 8th of September , 2014 i.e. after 3years, 3 months and 15 days.Mr. Dharam Parkash Kapoor has filed a complaint caseunder section 190, 156(3) and 200 ofCode of Criminal Procedure which is pending before the Hon’ble court of Mr.Ravindra Kr. Pandey, MM2 (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi against theComplaint of FIR/105/2011 Police Station Timarpur, Delhi and 11 others forwider justice for their prosecution and punishment under section166/166A/166B/167/217/218/219/384/385/386/388/120B/34 IPC and other provisionsof Criminal Law As Made out in the Cirstances. The devotees of famous ShriTriveni Balaji Mandir, Lucknow Road, Timarpur Delhi-110054 are very happy forthis justice from the Court of law.However, property dispute is pending with regard toProperty No. 1707, Outram Lane, Kingsway Camp, Delhi-110009 before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi under the name& style as enled as Ms. Sunita Kapoor W/o Sh. Dharam Prakash Kapoor VsMs. Sonia Muradia W/o Vikas Muradia Civil Suit(OS) No. 1388/2013 for amplejustice. For which Mr. Dharam Parkash Kapoor, devotee of Lord Balaji--HON’BLESUPREME COURT OF INDIA EMPLOYEE (SENIOR COURT ISTANT) was falselyimplicated.Kindly Find Attachment link of the Judgment for yourready reference.*:www.judis.nic/judis_...WITH REGARD TO THE ACQUITTAL OFCourt istant of Hon’ble SUPREME COURT OF INDIAfrom the charge of Raping DU GirlFor further information:FOLLOW THE LINK:trivenibalajidham.blogs...s:www.facebook/Trive...This ARTICLE is also published in “PRIME SPECTATOR” IN November’14www.primecrimeindia
    Reply
  2. T
    trivenibalajidham
    Nov 9, 2014 at 10:54 am
    BREAKING NEWSThere was a False implication on Mr. Dharam ParkashKapoor Court istant of Hon’ble SUPREME COURT OF INDIA @Priest/Sevak/Babaji/Guruji (Triveni Balaji Dham, Timarpur Delhi) U/s376/328/506 IPC FIR No. 105/2011 dated 15th May, 2011 of PSTimarpur, Delhi, who is an Employee of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India andhas now been Acquitted on 8th day of September 2014 by the Hon’bleTrial Court of Ms. Kaveri Baweja, ASJ, FTC-2, Tis Hazari, Delhi and releasedfrom the Judicial Custody on 8th of September , 2014 i.e. after 3years, 3 months and 15 days.Mr. Dharam Parkash Kapoor has filed a complaint caseunder section 190, 156(3) and 200 ofCode of Criminal Procedure which is pending before the Hon’ble court of Mr.Ravindra Kr. Pandey, MM2 (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi against theComplaint of FIR/105/2011 Police Station Timarpur, Delhi and 11 others forwider justice for their prosecution and punishment under section166/166A/166B/167/217/218/219/384/385/386/388/120B/34 IPC and other provisionsof Criminal Law As Made out in the Cirstances. The devotees of famous ShriTriveni Balaji Mandir, Lucknow Road, Timarpur Delhi-110054 are very happy forthis justice from the Court of law.However, property dispute is pending with regard toProperty No. 1707, Outram Lane, Kingsway Camp, Delhi-110009 before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi under the name& style as enled as Ms. Sunita Kapoor W/o Sh. Dharam Prakash Kapoor VsMs. Sonia Muradia W/o Vikas Muradia Civil Suit(OS) No. 1388/2013 for amplejustice. For which Mr. Dharam Parkash Kapoor, devotee of Lord Balaji--HON’BLESUPREME COURT OF INDIA EMPLOYEE (SENIOR COURT ISTANT) was falselyimplicated.Kindly Find Attachment link of the Judgment for yourready reference.*:www.judis.nic/judis_...WITH REGARD TO THE ACQUITTAL OFCourt istant of Hon’ble SUPREME COURT OF INDIAfrom the charge of Raping DU GirlFor further information:FOLLOW THE LINK:trivenibalajidham.blogs...s:www.facebook/Trive...This ARTICLE is also published in “PRIME SPECTATOR” IN November’14www.primecrimeindia
    Reply