Fact-finding report on JNU row: Need to probe Khalid’s role, says DM report

The report stated that Khalid had organised the protest despite objections raised by the JNU security.

Written by MAYURA JANWALKAR | New Delhi | Updated: March 4, 2016 12:55 pm
JNU student Umar Khalid who has been arrested on the charges of sedition JNU student Umar Khalid who has been arrested on the charges of sedition

On the day that Kanhaiya Kumar, the JNU students’ union president facing ‘sedition’ charges was granted bail by the Delhi High Court, the District Magistrate (DM), New Delhi arrived at the conclusion that the role of co-accused Umar Khalid in the events that transpired on the JNU campus on February 9, needs to be investigated further.

A 112-page report titled ‘Fact finding Report on the incident of raising of anti-national slogans in JNU Campus on 9 Feb 2016’ submitted to the Delhi government by District Magistrate Sanjay Kumar stated that ‘nothing adverse’ could be found against Kanhaiya and no witness or available video could support the allegations made against him.

In case of Khalid, however, the DM wrote, “Umar Khalid was visible in many videos. His support for the role of Kashmir and Afzal Guru is known and he was the organiser of the event. His role needs to be further investigated.”

WATCH VIDEO | Kanhaiya Released From Tihar Jail: What The Delhi Govt-Appointed Magisterial Probe Said

The report stated that Khalid had organised the protest despite objections raised by the JNU security. “His opinion on Kashmir and Afzal are known. He is part of the DSU (Democratic Students Union) and earlier conducted similar programs where sometimes permissions were cancelled or fine was imposed,” the report stated.

Khalid, the report stated, was one of the main organisers of the events that took place on February 9.

“Though hardly visible from any side, many security guards have identified his voice to be the first emerged from the crowd. I have shown the video of this footage to two-three witnesses, here they claim that first voice resembles that of Umar Khalid, thereafter, second voice is of Anirban and then Ashutosh. It could be presumed that Umar Khalid was the first speaker and initial slogans were raised by him, which were ‘Kashmir ki janta sangharsh karo, hum tumhare saath hai….Kashmir ki mahilaon sangharsh karo, hum tumhare saath hai’.”

About Anirban Bhattacharya and Ashutosh Kumar the report stated that “they possibly would have said,” Kitne Afzal maroge…har ghar se Afzal niklega and University Prashasan khabardar…Zor lagaa ke halla bol.”

The DM’s report also stated that Khalid had confronted the JNU security guard Amarjit Singh after he was told that the permission for the event to be held at the Sabarmati Dhaba at 5 pm was withdrawn by the vice-chancellor.

WATCH VIDEO: Kanhaiya Kumar’s Speech At JNU Campus After Release

After Khalid said that he would still go ahead with the program, the DM”s report stated that he and his associates pasted posters and set up a mike. After there was a confrontation between the security team and Khalid and his associates, about 10-15 students gathered near the Sabarmati Dhaba and shouted slogans. “Many students were from outside university especially some Kashmiri students join this group,” the report stated.

Many students who protested on the JNU campus on February 9 were ‘outsiders’, the DM inferred. He stated “It may be difficult to arrive conclusively whether other four students (Kanhaiya, Khalid, Anirban and Ashutosh) have shouted anti-national slogans or not but it was visible and heard beyond doubt that ‘these outsiders and possibly Kashmiri students’ were heard raising anti-national slogans. They should be identified for further investigation.”

Of the witnesses examined by the DM, Amarjeet Singh, a guard with G4S, had earlier said that he had heard Khalid shouting slogans like Bandook se lenge azaadi and Indian Army murdabad. But when he was shown a muted video clip in which, he claimed, Khalid had shouted the slogans.He pointed out the time at which Khalid shouted the slogans. However,. When the DM put the volume on, no such slogans were heard. “He retracted his statement and changed his earlier written statement. He admitted that they have memorised the Daily Diary entry for the sake of originality and authenticity. In his second statement he retracted hearing anyone specifically uttering those words,” the DM noted.

Devender Singh Bisht, Manager, G4S had also said he had heard Khalid shout slogans like Afzal Zindabad and Bandook se lenge azaadi but later he attributed these slogans to the crowd in general and not Khalid specifically.

Of the seven video clips examined by the DM, three were found to be doctored. One of doctored video was found in the URL — http://twitter.com.shilpitewari/status/70088979048964208?s=09. The video was titled ‘Proof Against Kanhaiya’ and the examination showed that it was “not authentic as the audio and video streams are from different sources.”

In another video titled ‘Very shocking & Disturbing Video From JNU #Shame.mp4’ which was also found doctored by the DM, the report stated, the word ‘Bandook’ could have been inserted and “there are other serious editing”.

About a 38-second TV news channel clip, the DM wrote,

“it was a doctored video with possible intention to misguide public.”

The DM explained how he selected the videos that were examined. He stated that he did not ask the public for different videos “to avoid any further public attention towards this issue.” He stated that he had received a Twitter link from a reporter as “alleged proof of involvement of Kanhaiya’s role in the whole incident.” He stated, “As I could not get any other video as proof against Kanhaiya, I also sought to get this examined.”

The seven videos that Kumar examined were selected for “the clarity of the content and their representational values to a particular point of view.”

Kumar wrote in his report that anti-national slogans were raised on JNU campus. “JNU administration has identified few faces who were clearly heard raising anti-India slogans. Whereabouts of them should be found out and their role must be investigated further,” Kumar wrote in the report.

The Delhi government will send the report to its legal team for views about further steps to be taken in the matter.

For all the latest Cities News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Aditya
    Mar 4, 2016 at 3:41 am
    Half baked report and everybody in JNU is proved innocent . KRAZYWAL you ashamed Lalu today.
    Reply
    1. M
      mohan
      Mar 4, 2016 at 4:10 am
      From History Books - the communists in Telangana had supported Nizam and the Razakars. But after the completion of OPERATION POLO, they turned coats and killed many Razakars. The Marxist revolutionary m murderer ideologue, Leon Trotsky, the founding leader of the Red Army was a major figure in the Bolshevik victory in the Russian Civil War (1918–1923). He is also known for his criminal role in the Holodomor Genocides against ethnic Europeans. Trotsky also invented the word racism to disable constructive debate and place the enemy on the defensive. In 1921 messengers representing starving European peasants asked Trotsky for help. He said this- “You are Starving? This is not famine yet, when your woman start eating their children then you may come and say we are starving”. The Chinese did NOT eat dogs till Mao's cultural revolution or Great Leap forward. Mao's Great Famine was the most Devastating man-made catastrophe in which at least 45 million people were starved, beaten, tortured or worked to death. The Chinese revolution was planned and executed by agencies and secret societies in USA. Princeling is the word for the fake intellectals or Revolutionary families of China who had falsely and forcefully indoctrinated the hapless and drug addicted Chinese potion. Communism does not mean equitable distribution of wealth to all people. The main purpose communists are to concentrate wealth, power and authority to very few individuals. Nehru liked socialism because it denied opportunities for everyone except his Royal family.
      Reply
      1. P
        pramod
        Mar 4, 2016 at 3:28 am
        Useless report with zero legal validity. This DM seems more powerful than HC judge and charge sheet by police. Kanjriwal find an opportunity to pay money to their lawyer friends ...strangely Sibbal (congress official lawyer ), NDTV ombudsperson and delhi government got together to fight case for Kanhaya even before this report. More strange is the same lawyer of delhi govt. wanted to fight case in HC from delhi police side and in fact first day wasted by him for his agenda and fee paid by tax payers.
        Reply
        1. N
          NANDAN
          Mar 4, 2016 at 4:59 am
          Kanhaiya could be innocent probably. But he must keep away from the likes of Khalid. Fighting for freedom in India is welcome. But close ociation with those who demand freedom from India must be avoided. Kanhaiya's speech at JNU proves that he has a way with words. He said he is from a poor family. In that case, he must concentrate on finishing his studies at the earliest and find ways to support his family. He must fight for the cause of poor and the same time must not fail to look after his own poor parents. Charity begins at home.
          Reply
          1. C
            Chacha Jee
            Mar 4, 2016 at 1:19 am
            JNU ( JIHADI NAXALITE UNIVERSITY ) and umar khalid have Islamic ageda. Khalid organized this anti national event and claims free speech. W Europe is crying for free speech. Why didn't he organized a cartoon compition. Why doesn't JNU students union does it for free speech.
            Reply
            1. S
              social heart
              Mar 4, 2016 at 12:19 pm
              Under the name of fighting for rights of poor, Russia collapsed internally under Stalin and other dictators. Left regimes in Bengal left it poor conditions, overthrown by people themselves. World over 'crying for downtrodden' is a mask to carry out anti social activities. True fighter for downtrodden were Ambedkar, hi, Savarkar who were constructive as well in their approach. In independent India, cry should be for 'Good governance' and see what Kejri has done to Delhi, Sonia to Congress, Leftists to Bengal and VIKAS is only way to improve conditions.
              Reply
            2. Load More Comments