Photocopying allowed under law for educational use: Delhi HC

‘No restriction on how much text can be photocopied as long as syllabus justifies it’.

Written by Aneesha Mathur | New Delhi | Updated: December 11, 2016 3:43 am
delhi university, photocopy, du photocopy, delhi university photocopy case, photocopy verdict, delhi high court, indian express news, india news Rameshwari Photocopy Service at Delhi School of Economics, North Campus. Archive photo

IN A judgment that is likely to have a far reaching impact on copyright law and publishing in India, the Delhi High Court on Friday said photocopying of copyrighted material for educational use was allowed under the Indian Copyright law, and there could be no restriction on how much of the book is copied as long as the demands of the course being taught justified it.

The division bench of Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Yogesh Khanna on Friday passed a 58-page judgment on an appeal filed by five international Publishers — Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd., Taylor & Francis Group, U.K.; and Taylor & Francis Books India Pvt. Ltd — against a single bench decision of the High Court.

Watch What Else Is making News

The single bench had dismissed the publishers’ case against copying of their copyrighted publications by DU-based Rameshwari Photocopy Service for preparation of “coursepacks”.

While allowing for copying of material under provisions of Section 52 (1) (i) of the Copyright Act, the bench has sent the suit filed by the publishers back to the single bench for trial on whether the course-packs being sold by the photocopier were “justified” by the existing syllabus.

du

“We declare that the law in India would not warrant an approach to answer the question by looking at whether the course pack has become a textbook. But by considering whether the inclusion of the copyrighted work in the course pack was justified by the purpose of the course pack – for instructional use by the teacher to the class – it would warrant an analysis of the course pack with reference to the objective of the course, the course content and the list of suggested readings. This would require expert evidence,” said the bench.

The division bench held that the “qualitative and quantitative tests” laid down under the “fair dealing” doctrine of Copyright law – to test whether use of copyright material is “fair” – does not apply to copying for “purpose of education” under Section 52(1)(i) of the Indian Copyright Act. The publishers had said tests for “fair use” of copyright material – including limit to how much of the material is copied and whether market of the copyright holder is affected – should apply.

The publishers had also sought a stay on the “course-packs” and said Delhi University should take the appropriate licence from the Indian Reprographic Rights Organisation to reproduce the books.

The court has now held that while creation of “course-packs” for educational purposes was allowed under law, the photocopier will have to face trial and prove that the syllabus and course content of the semester calls for the inclusion of the particular extracts of the copyrighted textbook in the “coursepack”.

The bench also dismissed the argument of the publisher that the Copyright Act did not allow for “mass photocopying” by the shop.

The court also upheld the argument by students and academic organisations that photocopying of expensive published books for academic purposes was justified for reasons of “public education”. It held that students were not expected to purchase the reference books, and were “not the potential customers”. Therefore, photocopying for academic purposes did not affect the publishers’ potential market.

The bench has refused to issue a stay on the working of the photocopy shop during the trial, but directed the copier to keep accounts and records of the material being copied and the course-packs being supplied.

For all the latest Cities News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    ss
    Dec 10, 2016 at 11:21 am
    While it is unfortunate for the publishers for such a decision , the fact is such decision is obvious due to technology . It takes less than one second to copy and paste a electronic copy of a book . CP . Can the authorities restrict that . If not then such decisions are obvious . The publishers should note this.
    Reply
  2. S
    ss
    Dec 10, 2016 at 11:21 am
    While it is unfortunate for the publishers for such a decision , the fact is such decision is obvious due to technology . It takes less than one second to copy and paste a electronic copy of a book . CP ORIGINAL_FILE NEW_FILE . Can the authorities restrict that . If not then such decisions are obvious . The publishers should note this.
    Reply
  3. A
    Anand Ch
    Dec 11, 2016 at 12:45 am
    Student taking xerox copy of few pages is lawful but if unscrupulous people make copies of book and sell then it is a crime. No student is expected to take copy of entire book.
    Reply
  4. P
    ProdyotPran
    Dec 11, 2016 at 1:27 am
    Education is becoming a very costly affair in India.lt;br/gt;A book in the nursery cl, bearing only around 52 pages, roughly half of them in four colours, cost more than Rs 300.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;How can we expect the poor to educate their children.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;eShopping can be the answer as it will bring down the overall cost of the book.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;Next, let us imagine a situation where 20 inside pages of a 300 paged book are damaged.lt;br/gt;Instead of buying a new book again, say at Rs.500, the best alternative will be to photocopy those pages for say Rs. 20.lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;And then, what can a student do when the book he needs is out of print?lt;br/gt;Photocopy the book, right?lt;br/gt;-lt;br/gt;This is a very dicey situation where all the parties involved are right in their own contentions.
    Reply