Centre vs Delhi Govt: HC refuses to quash BJP leader’s appointment as NDMC vice-chairman

In a plea before HC, AAP MLA Surender Singh had challenged Karan Singh Tanwar’s appointment.

Written by Aneesha Mathur | New Delhi | Published:July 16, 2015 1:18 am
delhi high court, BJp, NDMC, NDMC vice-chairman, AAP, Surender singh, karan singh tanwar, delhi news, city news, local news, Indian express The ASG also said that the Delhi government had deliberately proposed a different name, only after the Centre suggested Tanwar’s appointment for the post.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to get involved in yet another spat between the Centre and the Delhi government over yet another high-level appointment, that of BJP leader Karan Singh Tanwar as the member and vice-chairman of New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC).

The HC was hearing a plea filed by AAP MLA Surender Singh, challenging Tanwar’s appointment, seeking quashing of the notification appointing him as the NDMC vice-chairman and a stay on the oath-taking ceremony.

The court of Justice V P Vaish declined to give any interim orders and issued notices to the Central government, NDMC, Delhi government and Tanwar, asking them to respond to Singh’s plea by September 3.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General N K Kaul, appearing for the Central government, claimed that the Centre had sent several communications seeking the AAP government’s inputs on the issue, but it had failed to respond.

The argument was refuted by senior advocate Dayan Krishnan, who appeared for the Delhi government and argued that the Centre had not given adequate time to the Delhi CM to give his opinion on the issue. “Mere communication is not the same as consultation,” he said.

Senior advocate Sudhir Nandrajog, representing Surender Singh, argued that since the Delhi government and the Central government had both proposed different names for the position of NDMC vice-chairman, there should have been a “proper consultative process”.

The central government’s counsel, however, claimed that the AAP government was “trying to create a political battle” as it had initially not responded to the letters sent by the Home Ministry.

The ASG also said that the Delhi government had deliberately proposed a different name, only after the Centre suggested Tanwar’s appointment for the post.

The ASG also argued that “consultation” did not have to mean concurrence of opinion between the Centre and the state, and the Centre was “correct” in issuing the notification appointing Tanwar as member and vice-chairman of the NDMC as the post had remained vacant for several months.

For all the latest Cities News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    atul
    Jul 16, 2015 at 7:20 pm
    The question one should ask both the Centre and Delhi government is how long they will continue to waste public tax payer money on legal battles . The court should reject these cases at recipient stage as this AAP party is using Delhi government treasury like free money
    Reply
    1. L
      Lampiao
      Jul 16, 2015 at 8:55 am
      Perils of being an union territory with your enemy around you controls what goes in and what goes out. BJP is stiffling AAP but that would be their undoing. BJPs true face is much evident now with every ping day and the PM blissfully silient and busy handling foreign affairs while the internal affairs are handled by RSS.
      Reply