- The Big Picture: What’s AAP
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Bus from Burari laden with volunteers and hope
- Rare day out for AAP families
- Riot of support for AAP in communal hot spots
- Hunt on for CM house, will not accept Z-plus security
- No word from high command, Delhi Congress in a paralysis
- Latest News
- Second time at Ramlila Maidan: Hope overrides their doubts
- Kejriwal has no portfolio, will keep an eye on others
- In sea of white caps, BJP troika plans to be ‘forceful opposition’
- MP, MLA see Punjab as the next AAP stop
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Arvind Kejriwal repeats his advice to sting the corrupt, asks police to act against ‘goondagardi’
- Proud that one of our volunteers has become Delhi CM: Anna Hazare
- Arvind Kejriwal not to keep any portfolio
- Now an Aam Aadmi Party Cola by beverage-maker inspired by Arvind Kejriwal’s party
- New chief minister Arvind Kejriwal holds meetings at Delhi Secretariat
- Cong’s Ajay Maken blames Sheila Dikshit for Delhi polls debacle
- Left, right, AAP
On the leaders’ radars: Colonies, villages
With more people in colonies and villages coming out to cast their votes, the focus of the campaigns of political parties is more on these areas rather than sectors. The response that the campaigns of the political parties receive in the urban areas is relatively tepid.
Leaders of different parties state that during the campaign every party wants to show numbers which is not possible in the urban areas.
Around 30 per cent of the voters in Chandigarh reside in colonies and 14 per cent in villages. A substantial 56 per cent are there in urban areas. During the Lok Sabha elections of 2009, 68 per cent of colony dwellers cast their votes as compared to 64 per cent in the urban areas. While the vote share of the Congress was 54 per cent in the urban areas, far ahead of the other parties, in the colonies there was polarisation of votes.
The vote share of the Congress in colonies was 36 per cent. The BSP was close at 33 per cent and the BJP was third at 19 per cent.
In the rural areas, while the Congress polled 40 per cent votes, the BJP had 31 per cent. This time as well, division in the vote share of the parties in colonies is expected.
Senior Congress leader Subhash Chawla says, “The voting percentage is more in the colonies and villages than in the urban areas. Congress is approaching the colonies in order to consolidate its vote bank there. Campaigning is undertaken in sectors in the last 10 days. Also, the resident welfare associations prefer to hold meetings only at weekends when people are available.”
Over the past few days, padyatras and public meetings of the political parties are focused more on the colonies and villages. The Congress has reserved time in the morning for padyatras in colonies and in the evenings, public meetings are held in villages. Even the BJP which started its campaign in the end after the issue of candidature was settled has held more meetings in the colonies.
Former MP and senior leader Satya Pal Jain says that the voting in the colonies and villages is more than the urban areas. “During our campaigns, parties want to show crowds which is indicative of the response that is received. In colonies where the area is smaller, more crowd gathers. This does not happen in the sectors,” he says.
Demands of the colonies and villages dominate the agenda of the parties. From slum rehabilitation to increasing the lal dora and provision of basic amenities in these areas are some of the promises being made. In fact, when it comes to campaigning in sectors, the southern sectors are preferred by the political parties which are thickly populated. Parties prefer meeting industrialists or traders separately.
For the BSP, the traditional votebank is in colonies. The BSP has received only 8 per cent votes in the urban areas in the last election. The vote share in rural areas was 19 per cent while it was 33 per cent in colonies.
Candidate of the party Jannat Jahan says, “Around 70 per cent of my door-to-door campaigning has been in the villages and colonies. One gets more response in these areas. Campaigning in the sectors has to be done differently. In colonies people come out when we go from door-to-door. In sectors people do not bother. I have been going to sector markets.”