For not informing the changed schedule, due to which a customer had to miss his flight, Jet Airways has been directed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to reimburse the ticket amount worth Rs 55,000 with 9 per cent interest along with Rs 2,000 as litigation cost.
Complainant, Varun Manchanda, resident of Ferozpur had purchased an Air Ticket in 2012 from Amritsar to Delhi from Jet Airways. The departure of the flight was mentioned as 19.40 hours and arrival time of the flight at Delhi was 21.00 hours. Manchanda had booked his concerned flight ticket for Auckland of Malaysia Airlines and he purchased his air ticket for the said flight, the scheduled time of departure for Auckland was 23.10 hours.
When Manchanda had reached at International Airport, Amritsar, he was informed that the departure time of the aforesaid flight was changed from 19.40 hours to 20.35 hours. It was stated that the change of time was never informed to him by the Jet Airways, due to which he had missed his flight and he had to spend his night at the Delhi Airport. Manchanda, then purchased a fresh ticket by spending Rs 55,000. He further alleged that he had to join his duties the next day but due to negligence on the part of the opposite party, he could not reach in time.
- Pakistan High Commission Staffer Caught With Defence Documents: What It Means For India & Pakistan
- The Royal Opera House Reopens After Decades Of Neglect: Here’s A Quick Tour
- Tata Sons Rubbishes Cyrus Mistry’s Allegations: Here’s What Happened
- Pakistan High Commissioner denies allegations leveled on his staffer for espionage activities
- Odisha: Villagers Refuse To Cremate Dalit Woman’s Body
- Here’s What Farhan Akhtar Said On Karan Johar-MNS ‘Deal’ Over Ae Dil Hai Mushkil’s Release
- Government’s Diwali Gift to Central Government Employees, Pensioners
- Bigg Boss 10 26th October Review: This Episode Is All About Fights
- New Zealand Beat India By 19 Runs In Ranchi; Series Levelled At 2-2
- DND Toll-Free: Noida Toll Company Moves Supreme Court Against Allahabad High Court
- British PM Theresa May Says Kashmir Is A Matter For India, Pakistan To Sort Out
- J&K: Students Suffer As Schools Along LOC Forced To Shut Amid Firing
- Jayalalithaa’s Health: AIADMK Women Supporters Continue Special Prayers For CM
- HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle First Look Video
- Fissures Remain Within Samajwadi Party: All You Need To Know
However, the opposite party in their written version stated that the schedules were subject to change without notice and the said change in time was carried as part of winter schedule. It was submitted that the rescheduling of the departure timing of the flight does not amount to any deficiency in service. It was further stated that on the E-ticket for the flight, nowhere the opposite party had guaranteed or had taken any responsibility regarding the complainant’s onward flight. Feeling cheated, Manchanda had filed a complaint.
On the day of the hearing, none of the contentions raised by the opposite party were accepted, instead, it was resolved that it was the foremost duty of the opposite party to inform the customers about the changed schedule. Thus, allowing the complaint, State Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission has directed the opposite to refund the amount, which he spent on purchasing a fresh ticket along with Rs 2,000 on account of litigation expenses.