Moody’s Investors Service on Wednesday affirmed India’s sovereign rating at ‘Baa3’ with a positive outlook, saying it expects policymakers to continue reforms to achieve balanced growth and reduce the government’s debt load. India had pitched hard with Moody’s for a rating upgrade, but the US-based agency has maintained that it would wait for
“tangible” benefits of reform initiatives before upgrading its sovereign rating. “The policy effort has not delivered a sufficiently clear prospect of the reform dividends — sustained, high growth and the promise of a reduction in the country’s debt burden — to support an upgrade,” Moody’s said as it affirmed India’s ‘Baa3’ ratings while maintaining a ‘positive’ outlook. The positive outlook denotes Moody’s expectation that, over time, India’s credit metrics will likely shift to levels consistent with a ‘Baa2’ rating.
“In particular, the outlook reflects our expectation that continued policy reform implementation will allow
balanced growth to support a reduction in the government debt burden, currently a constraint on India’s rating,” it said. Baa3 rating implies lowest investment grade — just a notch above ‘junk’ status.
A broad range of policies have been implemented that are conducive to moderating inflation and limited current account deficits. A number of policy reforms, if effective, would lead to higher investment and more efficient savings, Moody’s said. The passage and ongoing implementation of a range of economic reform measures, including the goods and services tax and reform of the bankruptcy code, points to improvements in government effectiveness, it added. “Policy reforms are still relatively recent with material uncertainty about the effectiveness of measures already implemented and whether momentum will sustain,” Moody’s said.
However, private investment has not picked up in response to the government’s measures, denoting limited policy
effectiveness. Its assessment is investment has been constrained by high leverage in some sectors, a relatively unfavourable global environment and in some cases, limited access to finance. Businesses may have to wait for more certainty about the tangible implications of reforms on their operating environment.
The coordination and alignment of objectives between different parts of the government and the private sector poses
implementation challenges, it added. The sovereign rating and outlook for a country are often referred to as key parameters by foreign investors and global bodies to gauge its investment climate.
- Here’s Why Delhi-NCR Gets Pollution Code On Lines Of Beijing
- PM Modi Is More Interested In TRP Politics Rahul Gandhi At Congress Parliamentary Meet
- Bigg Boss 10 December 1 Review: Priyanka Jagga Succeeds In Her Divide And Rule Strategy
- Kahaani 2 Audience Reaction: Vidya Balan Starrer Thriller Gets Mixed Reviews
- Find Out What PM Modi Said About Demonetisation On LinkedIn
- Row Over West Bengal ”Military Coup” Issue Escalates: Who Said What
- Here’s How Mohammad Kaif Replied To Virender Sehwag’s Birthday Wish On Twitter
- West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s Flight Reportedly Had Low Fuel: Here’s What Happened
- Reliance Jio Welcome Offer Extended Till March 31, JioMoney Launched
- Uri Attackers Came From Pakistan, Establishes Digital Data
- Bigg Boss 10 Nov 30 Episode Review: Captaincy Brings Differences In Manoj Punjabi & Manveer Gurjar
- Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi’s Official Twitter Handle Hacked
- After Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter Handle, Congress Official Twitter Account Hacked
- 3 Dead As Army Helicopter Crashes In Sukna In West Bengal
- BJP, Congress Engage In War Of Words Over Nagrota Attack: Find Out More
The banking sector, Moody’s said, however continues to pose “material contingent liability risks to the sovereign”. “However, the reform effort to date has not yet achieved the conditions that would support an upgrade to Baa2, in
particular in accelerating private investment to support high, stable growth, without which the government’s debt burden — a key constraint on the rating — is likely to remain high for a sustained period,” it said.
Moody’s, which had raised India’s outlook to positive from stable, said the asset quality, loan loss coverage and
capital ratio of banks remain weak and this poses sovereign credit risks. “While recognition of non-performing loans has largely been achieved, lack of resolution of impaired loans will continue to constrain India’s sovereign credit profile until a viable resolution mechanism is put in place,” it said.
Moody’s further said India’s rating is constrained by low per capita income, over dependence of farm sector on monsoon and high government debt. On the revenue side, India’s large low-income population limits the government’s tax revenue base. At 20.9 per cent of GDP in 2015, general government revenues were markedly lower than the 27.1 per cent median for Baa-rated sovereigns.
Although the implementation of GST and other measures that are aimed at enhancing tax collection will help widen and boost revenues, the effect will only materialise over time and their magnitude is uncertain so far. “As a result, the general government deficits will remain sizeable and any reduction in India’s government debt burden
will largely rely on robust nominal GDP growth. We expect that the debt-to-GDP ratio will hover around the current levels, at 68.6 per cent in 2015, before falling gradually as nominal GDP growth is sustained and revenue-broadening and expenditure efficiency-enhancing measures take effect,” it said.
Moody’s said it will consider a rating upgrade on evidence that institutional strengthening will elicit sustained macro-economic stability, higher levels of investment and more favourable fiscal dynamics. Evidence of institutional effectiveness will get reflected through revival in private investment, improving infrastructure, and/or additional policies to enhance India’s economic and financial strength.
“These policies could include land or labour reforms by a significant number of states, the establishment of a credible and effective fiscal framework, complemented by measures to reduce expenditures or increase revenues, tangible progress in implementation of the bankruptcy law and a workable strategy to resolve banks’ bad assets over the medium term,” it said.