Jindal Steel Bolivia, an arm of Jindal Steel and Power, has won in excess of USD 22.5 million arbitration judgement against state-run mining company Empresa Siderurgica del Mutun (ESM).
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
“Jindal Steel Bolivia has been vindicated in connection with its investment in the El Mutun project in Bolivia by an international tribunal ordering payment to Jindal of more than USD 22.5 million by ESM,” JSPL said in a statement today.
Jindal commenced arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of Paris and sought recovery of USD 18 million principal, plus interest, related to the illegal encashment of the bank guarantees.
In an award dated August 6, 2014, the ICC Tribunal agreed granting principal plus interest for a total in excess of USD 22.5 million, the company said.
JSPL had in 2007 entered into a joint venture pact with Bolivian state, ESM and another state-run firm to develop and exploit El Mutun iron ore mine, having reserves of around 40 billion tonnes of iron ore in eastern Bolivia.
The company also planned to set up a 1.7 million tonne per annum capacity steel plant along with other facilities for backward integration with an investment of USD 2.1 billion.
JSPL said it had invested “tens of millions of dollars” in the project, including providing USD 18 million in project guarantees.
It said the project was impeded because it never received access to land where the project was to be developed, contrary to the contract. In the statement, Jindal also said that bank guarantees amounting to USD 18 million were wrongly encashed.
JSPL said Tribunal ruled that there was no entitlement “to encash the guarantees” and “ESM breached, with its encashment, the Contract obligations in respect of Jindal”.
“There was ‘more than sufficient evidence…to establish that ESM did not comply with the obligation to deliver the lands’ and this suspended Jindal’s obligations under the Contract,” JSPL quoted the Tribunal as saying.
In addition to unlawful encashment in 2010, additional actions by Bolivia and its entities undermined the El Mutún project and forced the termination of the project contract, it said.
“Jindal has commenced a second ICC arbitration related to the project, focused among other things on damages arising out of the termination of the Mutún contract. Jindal is seeking damages approaching approximately USD 100 million. The case is pending. Jindal instructed the international lawyers of White & Case for both arbitrations,” JSPL said.
It added: “Bolivia’s treatment of Jindal and its representatives has reflected a pattern of maltreatment of foreign investors and their representatives in Bolivia in recent years.
“In response to its victory, Jindal observed that Bolivia and its entities broke Jindal’s trust, broke Jindal’s investment, and acted in violation of the contract and law. The case result vindicates Jindal’s efforts to develop the El Mutún project despite the circumstances in Bolivia.”