EPF tax row: Will disclose final decision in Budget debate, says Jaitley

‘Department’s intention is not revenue raising ... but to make India more insured ‘

By: ENS Economic Bureau | New Delhi | Updated: March 3, 2016 12:56 pm
provindent fund tax, employee provident fund, tax on provident fund, pension, epf, epf tax, budget 2016, union budget 2016, budget 2016 epf tax, tax on epf budget 2016, india news, business news, latest news Finance Minister Arun Jaitley

Finance minister Arun Jaitley on Wednesday said he would spell out the final decision on taxing withdrawals from the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) at the time of replying to a debate in Parliament. The Budget decision proposing to tax 60 per cent of the withdrawal from EPF contributions to be made after April 1 has come in for sharp criticism. The finance ministry on Tuesday indicated a partial roll back of the move.

“Now there have been some reactions (on EPF tax issue). When the debate comes up in Parliament, I will give the government’s response as to what decision we finally take in this matter,” Jaitley said, while speaking at a post-Budget conference with industry chambers. The minister said the EPF withdrawal tax is not aimed at raising revenues, rather the emphasis of the government is to make India a pensioned and insured society. No tax will levied if the corpus at the time of withdrawal is invested in pension-based annuities, he said.

Watch Video | PF Tax: Making Sense Of Govt’s Clarification

In a clarification on the issue on Tuesday, the finance ministry said the “original members” of EPFO, who are within the statutory wage limit of Rs 15,000 per month will not be impacted by this proposed change. The move will impact only about 70 lakh out of the total 3.7 crore EPFO subscribers.

Share This Article
Related Article

“The EPFO has about 3.7 crore members of which about 3 crore members are those in the earning category of Rs 15,000 and below. For them there is no change,” he said. “It is only those private sector employees who have just joined that this will impact them.”

Watch Video | Keystrokes: EPF Tax

The finance ministry is also considering suggestions of levying tax only on accumulated returns on the corpus and not on the contributed amount. The proposal is being criticised by various employees unions including RSS-backed Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, political parties and the EPFO’s Central Board of Trustees. On other taxation proposals, Jaitley said the Budget was focused on simplifying tax rules and it expanded the scope of presumptive taxation to make taxpayers’ life easier. Arguing that the thrust of government expenditure must be in agricultural and rural sectors, he said the actual development expenditure of the government will exceed the Budget estimates in the current year.

He said the government collected more revenue in the current year and spent more, as higher public investment improved growth. Indian economy is projected to grow at 7.6 per cent in 2015-16. He reiterated Centre’s committed to meet fiscal deficit target of 3.5 per cent of GDP for the next fiscal.

For all the latest Business News, download Indian Express App

  1. I
    Mar 3, 2016 at 8:45 am
    I say tax them, tax the ried cl heavily because they are the only ones who has no choice at all. Leave the remaining few (about 95%??) , they are so tiny that that it doesnt matter at all.
    1. K
      Mar 3, 2016 at 6:38 am
      Why to mis-treat the 70 Lakh high earning private sector employees? They are paying high taxes. And by the way, the PF withdrawal tax is for all. All new taxes introduced in EFP must be withdrawn.
      1. RAJ rai
        Mar 3, 2016 at 2:50 am
        Taxing EPF is very bad This needs to be removed
        1. P
          Mar 3, 2016 at 10:23 am
          his logic for the tax is totally convoluted and fails the test of scientific reasoning... it is only thrusting the policy down the throat of people
          1. Shankar Shankar
            Mar 3, 2016 at 11:38 am
            Shunning responsibility by government. If government is so much worried about welfare of employees, it should switch over to Old pension scheme and abolish NPS from all sectors. Everyone is aware that no pension scheme is attractive and the return on investment when invested in any annuity scheme is less than 6% per annum. Any prudent person will think ten times before investing in an annuity scheme with less than 10-12% return per annum, to run the family even for a month. If government is really honest, there should be a return of at least 12 % p.a. in all annuity schemes. Eye washing explanation will make citizens more hostile towards BJP.
            1. Load More Comments