Delhi court ruled that chances of the legislator fleeing from justice was remote and he deserved the relief.
The chief security officer (CSO) of AIIMS lodged the complaint against Bharti for allegedly misbehaving with security personnel and damaging government property.
Neither Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal nor other top AAP leaders have commented on the issue on Twitter or in public space.
Police’s lawyer Shailendra Babbar opposed the contention saying he has been appointed as SPP for this case by the Lieutenant Governor.
The IO had on October 3 submitted the report while informing the court that prosecution sanction against Bharti has been accorded by the competent authority.
Psychopolitically, Somnath Bharti’s labrador is the diametric opposite of the dog on the record label.
Somnath Bharti alleged it was Lipika who had threatened to cut herself after which Bharti had called her mother and brother to intervene and settle the matter.
Somnath Bharti’s wife Lipika has alleged that the AAP leader had unleashed his pet on her during pregnancy and even slit her wrist with a kitchen knife.
The Supreme Court had on October 1 denied interim bail to Somnath Bharti and sought the presence of his wife before it to explore the possibility of mediation.
Earlier in the day, the apex court disposed of Bharti’s anticipatory bail plea after his wife Lipika refused to undergo mediation.
Somnath Bharti’s wife Lipika Mitra had filed a complaint of domestic violence with Delhi Commission for Women on June 10 alleging that her husband had been abusing her since their marriage in 2010.
Bharti had on September 23 moved the apex court seeking protection from arrest in the case and a direction to restrain Delhi Police from arresting him till his plea challenging the High Court order is decided.
Police also informed the court that it has sought sanction, from the “competent authority”, to prosecute the leader in the case.
Bharti, who has repeatedly denied the charges, maintained that he had not committed any of the offences his wife has accused him of, said sources in the Delhi police.
Badal claimed that there was no other party in Punjab that could challenge the SAD as the only one that took a stand against suppression.