Rahul Gandhi at UC Berkely: “I absolutely love the community. If there’s anything I can do to help them get justice. I’ll be the first person to do so”
“In these circumstances, let court notice (be issued) to the chairman, SIT i.e. Anurag to appear in person to clarify on the facts as to why only further investigation was carried out despite the mandate of SIT to investigate/ re-investigate the facts,” the court said.
The bench then observed that at many places, witnesses did not turn up because of fear. How could the accused’s guilt be then established, it asked. There could be the complicity of police and the accused. Despite scores of people being killed, no bodies were recovered, it said.
High court issues notice to Congress leader Sajjan Kumar seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail on a plea filed by the SIT. Kumar was given an anticipatory bail by the trial court last year in matter related to 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.
The details of these cases were also uploaded on the website of the Ministry of Home Affairs to give wide publicity. “The outcome of the investigation has been conveyed to the complainants or their legal heirs by the SIT. The progress of the work of the SIT is being monitored by the MHA on regular basis,” he said.
Criticised for seeking to distinguish between the 1984 anti-Sikh riots and the 2002 Gujarat riots, JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar was forced to clarify. Here’s what he said.
A day after JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar’s controversial remarks claiming there was a difference between the 1984 riots and the 2002 riots, his colleagues in the Left have expressed their disagreement.
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul transferred the case from Karkardooma court to Patiala House court.
CBI took this stand in a submission filed a local court which had listed the case for pronouncement of order on whether to accept the agency’s closure report.
On Sunday, Phoolka claimed that Harsimrat Badal had never raised the issue of Jadish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar in the cabinet.
Kejriwal along with his Deputy Manish Sisodia distributed the enhanced compensation cheques of Rs 5 lakh to the kin of each of the 1,300 people killed in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
Thirty-one years later, they were all going to receive enhanced compensation cheques for Rs 5 lakh from the Delhi government.
Manjit Singh invoked history to justify the decision of the high priests.
Sheela Kaur’s husband Balveer Singh and her father-in-law were killed in the riots.
The plea said it was “highly unfortunate that the CBI is able to trace only those witnesses who are deposing in Tytler’s favour”.